Our website UX and conversion audit maps user intent against what your interface actually enables. The gaps? That’s where the work begins.
No one knows what the primary action is.
Every screen’s decision points are mapped. Intent is clear.
Your layout falls apart when content shifts.
Design that keeps spacing and flow intact no matter the input.
You’re getting traffic, but not conversions.
User hesitation zones patched. Drop off points sealed.
Editing the site, but nothing feels aligned.
Visual systems that scale — not scatter — as your team grows.
Every build is scoped from the inside out. Pricing reflects your site’s logic, roles,
and systems — not just its size.
We've worked with Toimi on two projects now, and both times the result was spot on. Timelines were realistic, communication was clear, and the team handled all details without us having to chase.
They didn't just ship features — they explained trade-offs, suggested improvements, and really thought about long-term use. Felt like an extension of our team.
Fast, professional, and no overcomplication. Our landing page went live on schedule and performed better than expected.
Easy to work with, thank you!
Didn’t find what you were looking for? Drop us a line at info@toimi.pro.
High drop-off in key funnels, consistent usability complaints, competitors winning on experience, planning major updates, or preparing for investor due diligence. In Mountain View's market, where users switch at the slightest friction, audits identify specific issues causing lost revenue — providing targeted improvement roadmaps rather than costly full redesigns.
Seven dimensions: usability, accessibility, visual design, information architecture, performance perception, conversion optimization, and competitive positioning. Each scored with specific findings and prioritized recommendations. For Mountain View products, competitive positioning is benchmarked against the best Valley-built interfaces.
5-8 Mountain View-area participants completing core tasks while we observe behavior, note confusion, and record feedback. Analysis includes success rates, time-on-task, severity-rated findings, and video highlights. Mountain View participants represent your actual users — their tech literacy and expectations differ significantly from national averages.
Behavioral data analysis — funnels, engagement, user flows, feature adoption, retention cohorts. For Mountain View SaaS: correlation between UX findings and business metrics (MRR, churn, expansion). Data-driven prioritization ensuring recommendations focus on business impact.
Executive summary, detailed findings by severity, specific recommendations with mockups, competitive comparison, and prioritized implementation roadmap. Live workshop walking your Mountain View team through each insight. Engineering-friendly effort estimates and dependency notes for implementation planning.
2-3 weeks standard — one week evaluation, one week testing, one week synthesis. Access needed: product accounts, analytics, customer feedback, and 5-8 test users. 4-week option for complex Mountain View products with multiple user roles.
Typically 15-30% improvement in target conversion metrics, 20-40% support ticket reduction, measurable satisfaction improvement. Mountain View SaaS companies frequently increase revenue without adding features — simply fixing UX issues. Audit investment recovered within the first quarter of implementing priority recommendations.
Detailed specs for internal teams, hands-on redesign of priority screens, developer-ready prototypes, and implementation verification. For Mountain View companies without internal design resources, we implement the full roadmap. For those with teams, we advise during implementation ensuring faithful execution.