Search engines need a clear path. We fix crawl errors,
loading delays, and index
gaps so nothing valuable
gets overlooked.
Slow pages hurt
you rankings.
We optimize Core Web Vitals
and remove bottlenecks.
Duplicate or broken
URLs waste authority.
We resolve canonical conflicts, redirects, and crawl loops.
Mobile experience underperforms.
We ensure responsive design
and scripts perform seamlessly.
Updates don’t reflect
in search.
We audit sitemaps and indexing for discoverability.
We price based on site scale, audit complexity, and implementation depth
— not traffic volume.
Each plan adapts to your current setup, goals, and technical stack.
5
What impressed me most was how Toimi combined design sense with technical detail. Every idea was backed up by reasoning, and they weren't afraid to challenge us if it meant a stronger outcome.
5
We had a pretty complex setup request. They broke it down, kept us updated at every step, and delivered earlier than we thought possible.
5
Clear process, fast approvals, no drama. Exactly how a project should run.
5
We'll definitely continue working together.
Didn’t find what you were looking for? Drop us a line at info@toimi.pro.
The cost depends on the size of your site, the complexity of the technical stack, and the depth of analysis required. A focused technical audit of a five-page service site for a Seattle professional services firm differs significantly from a comprehensive crawl health review of a multi-section platform with thousands of indexed pages — a life sciences company near the University of Washington with separate research, clinical, and investor sections, a tech company in the South Lake Union corridor with a product documentation library and multilingual support content, or an aerospace contractor with subsidiary sites serving different Pacific Northwest procurement audiences. We confirm exact pricing after an initial review of your site size, platform, and the specific technical questions you need answered. Most technical SEO audits start from a few hundred dollars for focused reviews and scale with page count, technical complexity, and competitor benchmarking depth.
A standard technical SEO audit — covering crawlability, indexation, page speed, mobile usability, structured data, redirect health, and Core Web Vitals — typically takes 1 to 2 weeks for a standard business site. For Seattle businesses with large content libraries, complex JavaScript rendering requirements, or multi-subdomain architectures — common in healthcare organizations affiliated with UW Medicine managing separate patient portal and research subdomains, enterprise tech companies with product documentation microsites, and aerospace contractors with distinct regional and government-facing site sections — the audit runs 2 to 4 weeks to cover every technical dimension thoroughly. Findings are delivered as a structured report organized by priority with every issue documented in plain language before any fix work is scoped or commissioned.
Businesses that have invested in content and on-page optimization but are seeing poor crawl coverage, indexation gaps, or rankings that plateau despite quality content are the most common technical audit clients. In Seattle, this includes tech startups in the South Lake Union and Capitol Hill corridors whose sites were built by developers without SEO requirements in the brief — resulting in JavaScript rendering issues, client-side routing that blocks crawlers, or dynamic content that search engines cannot index. Life sciences companies near the University of Washington with patient portal subdomains and gated research content creating crawl budget waste, and e-commerce businesses targeting the Pacific Northwest market with faceted navigation generating thousands of duplicate URLs, are both profiles where a technical audit reliably uncovers issues that explain organic underperformance more completely than any content gap analysis would.
Our technical audit covers every dimension of site infrastructure that affects how search engines crawl, render, and index your Seattle business's website. This includes crawlability and robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap accuracy and Google Search Console submission status, indexation coverage and noindex tag audit, canonical tag implementation across duplicate and near-duplicate content, redirect chain mapping and redirect loop identification, page speed and Core Web Vitals across desktop and mobile — particularly important for Seattle's mobile-heavy commuter audience on King County Metro and Sound Transit — mobile usability and viewport configuration, structured data markup validity and rich result eligibility, HTTPS implementation and mixed content issues, duplicate content from URL parameter variations, and hreflang implementation for any multilingual content targeting Seattle's internationally connected business community.
Every finding is assigned a priority level — critical, significant, or minor — based on its direct impact on crawling, indexation, and ranking potential. Critical issues are those actively preventing pages from being indexed or ranking correctly: blocked crawl paths, widespread noindex tags on key service pages, broken canonical chains directing authority away from priority content, or severe Core Web Vitals failures that trigger Google's page experience ranking signals. For Seattle businesses in competitive niches — enterprise tech, life sciences, healthcare, and professional services competing against nationally recognized Puget Sound companies — we prioritize fixes that close the largest gap between current technical performance and what top-ranking competitors deliver. The audit report presents fixes in the order your development team should address them, not in the order they were discovered during the crawl.
A technical SEO audit examines how your site is built and served — the infrastructure layer that determines whether search engines can access, render, and index your content correctly regardless of its quality. An on-page SEO review examines what your pages say and how they signal relevance to target keywords. Both matter, but they address different ranking barriers. A Seattle business with technically clean infrastructure but poorly optimized content will rank below competitors whose pages better match search intent. Conversely, well-written pages on a technically broken site may never rank regardless of content quality. The audit tells you whether technical issues are the primary barrier before you invest further in content work that may be constrained by infrastructure problems your Seattle development team is unaware of.
Audit findings are delivered as a structured report organized by priority tier, with each issue documented by affected URL set, technical explanation, business impact, and specific recommended fix written as a direct developer brief. For Seattle clients with in-house engineering teams — common in the city's tech, aerospace, and enterprise software sectors — the report is detailed enough that fixes can be implemented without requiring Toimi to be present for each step. For clients without in-house technical resource, we scope a fix implementation project based on audit findings and handle every change in a staging environment before deploying to the live site. A walkthrough call is included with every audit delivery so your team can ask questions about any finding before implementation begins.
Technical issues recur as Seattle sites grow — new pages added without following established URL conventions, CMS or framework updates that introduce rendering changes, third-party scripts accumulated from marketing and analytics tools that degrade Core Web Vitals, and structured data markup that becomes invalid after platform updates. For Seattle clients who want to maintain technical SEO health proactively rather than addressing issues reactively after rankings have already declined, we offer a quarterly technical health check as part of an ongoing SEO retainer — covering a focused crawl review, Core Web Vitals monitoring, new redirect requirements from content changes, and structured data validation. Clients on an active retainer receive technical governance as a continuous component of their SEO program rather than a periodic audit commissioned after the damage is done.
