Before they feel hunger, they feel your UI.
Delight them with speed, clarity, and zero confusion.
We build apps that deliver instant UI clarity, smooth taps, and a fast, seamless checkout flow. Your product will be worth returning to.
Too many steps to place
a simple order.
Streamlined core flows
to minimize taps.
Category structure confuses new users.
Reorganized navigation for faster orientation.
Checkout drops
due to friction or clutter.
Simplified UI with autofill
and saved preferences.
Reorders take more effort than first orders.
Introduced repeat logic, shortcuts, and user history.
Effort scales with states, branching logic, and UX depth —
not how many tabs show up in Figma.
Big thanks to the Toimi team! Everything was done thoughtfully, tastefully, and right on schedule. Loved how design and development were handled together — quick approvals, quick launch. Super easy to work with.
We came in with a task tailored to our business — and everything was adapted to fit, no templates. What we appreciated most is that they didn't just think about how to build it, but why. You can feel the care in their approach.
We ordered a webinar interface design and a couple of fintech-related things from Toimi — everything was on point. What stood out was that they didn't just deliver, but also suggested ways to simplify. We took notes.
We plan to continue working
with Toimi!
Didn’t find what you were looking for? Drop us a line at info@toimi.pro.
Yes. Fixing just the menu, promo logic, or checkout screens is common — especially when the app works but conversions dip in one spot. No need to overhaul what's stable.
iOS and Android users tap differently. Every flow is reviewed for native gestures, spacing, and logic — not just ported over and reskinned.
Designs adapt to real-world usage: riders on old phones, customers on tablets, staff on in-store displays. Breakpoints are tested around those use cases — not just device specs.
Good is fine — until it stalls. If orders are consistent but reorders drop, or if staff keep making the same mistake, it's usually not about adding features. It's about cleaning up what's already there.
No. Rough diagrams or even verbal flows are enough to get started. If the logic is tangled,
part of the job is untangling it.